- AI Business Playbook
- Posts
- The Agent Evaluation Problem Everyone's Ignoring
The Agent Evaluation Problem Everyone's Ignoring
(How to Measure AI That Thinks in Steps)
Everyone's building AI agents. Almost nobody knows if they're working properly.
Last week I dove into the evaluation problem that's quietly killing agent deployments. Standard metrics like "accuracy" completely miss the point when AI systems reason through multi-step processes.
Here's what I discovered that changes everything about measuring AI performance.
The Traditional Problem
What we measure:
✓ Did the agent get the right answer?
What we miss:
❓ How did it think through the problem?
❓ Can we trust its reasoning process?
❓ Will it fail predictably or randomly?
This gap is killing production deployments. I found agents scoring 90% on accuracy but only 60% on reasoning quality—they're getting lucky, not thinking clearly.
Three Breakthrough Evaluation Methods
1. Faithfulness Scoring
Instead of just checking final answers, evaluate whether each reasoning step logically follows from the previous one.
Real discovery: Agents that score high on accuracy often fail on faithfulness. They reach correct conclusions through flawed reasoning—a recipe for unpredictable failures.
2. Process Reliability Metrics
Track how consistently agents follow their intended reasoning patterns. The best production systems maintain 95%+ process consistency even when final answers vary.
Key insight: Consistent process = predictable outcomes. Random process = random failures.
3. Failure Mode Analysis
Map exactly where and why agents break down. This revealed that 80% of agent failures happen in the same 3 decision points—completely fixable with targeted training.
The pattern: Most failures cluster around:
Context window overflow (32% of failures)
Tool integration errors (28% of failures)
Logical fallacy propagation (21% of failures)
Real-World Results
After implementing these evaluation frameworks, our agent deployment reliability improved from 70% to 94%.
More importantly, we could predict and prevent failures instead of just reacting to them.
The transformation: From "hope it works" to "know it will work."
Implementation Guide
Week 1: Set up faithfulness scoring on existing agents
Week 2: Implement process consistency tracking
Week 3: Build failure mode analysis dashboards
Week 4: Create continuous improvement loops
What's Next
The shift from measuring outputs to measuring reasoning changes everything. Next week: Advanced prompt engineering for multi-agent coordination.
Until then,
Wyatt
Connect With Me
🔹 LinkedIn: Follow me on LinkedIn for daily tips on AI implementation and what I’m learning each day.
🔹 Twitter: @WyattBrocato for quick AI insights and updates
🔹 Substack: Follow me on Substack for access to deep-dives, community access, and so much more.
Forward this to a friend who's interested in AI but struggles to get good results. They'll thank you later.